Strategies for Democrats

Introduction:
Democrats in the U.S. face a well-oiled conservative outrage machine – epitomized by Fox News’s 24/7 cycle of indignation – that keeps Republican base voters energized and shapes the national narrative. In a recent conversation, Jon Stewart and journalist Mehdi Hasan discussed how Democrats often struggle to match the “authentic rage and anger and moral outrage” that the right wields so effectively[1]. Indeed, analysts note that Republicans have spent years building a “coordinated, well-funded media ecosystem” to amplify their message, while Democrats’ messaging often shifts and gets defensive[2]. If Democrats continue to focus only on policy details and “kitchen-table” pragmatism without an emotional punch, they risk ceding the information battlefield to the GOP’s outrage machine[3]. To counteract Fox News’s 24/7 messaging and recapture the public narrative, Democrats must cultivate a relentless (and genuine) moral outrage of their own. Below we outline strategies – in media engagement and in legislative behavior – for Democratic politicians, voters, and allied media figures to project a passionate, values-driven message. (Crucially, this doesn’t mean adopting misinformation or hate, but rather matching the right’s intensity with fact-based moral conviction.)

The Challenge: Fox’s Outrage Machine vs. Democratic Messaging

Fox News and its allies have mastered the art of perpetual outrage. Every day brings a new flashpoint – whether trivial (like Dr. Seuss books or M&M’s redesigns) or serious – that conservative media elevates into a battle for the soul of America. This drumbeat keeps their base emotionally engaged and “encouraged to embrace cathartic rage against rotating groups of enemies”, as one commentator described[4][3]. The GOP’s communications apparatus can “toggle [this] national rage machine on or off at will,” drowning out nuanced policy achievements with a flood of anger-inducing content[3]. Democrats, by contrast, often rely on dry fact-checking, rational appeals, and inconsistent messaging that fails to spark the same visceral passion. Even popular Democratic policies can get overshadowed in an environment where outrage – not facts – drives the news cycle[5]. Stewart and Hasan argue that Democrats need to fight fire with fire – not by spreading lies, but by voicing their own outrage at injustice just as loudly and relentlessly. The goal is to create an emotional echo chamber on the left that can rival the right’s, while staying grounded in truth and inclusive values. Below are concrete strategies to build that capacity.

Media Engagement Strategies for Relentless Moral Outrage

• Build a Unified Progressive Message Machine: Democratic leaders and communicators should coordinate their core messages on a daily and weekly basis to present a united front. Republicans, “backed by billionaires…built a coordinated, well-funded media ecosystem that operates like a well-oiled machine”, ensuring their talking points saturate talk radio, cable news, and social feeds in unison[2]. Democrats can emulate this by sharing common talking points and thematic outrage across platforms. For example, if the outrage of the week is a draconian GOP bill or scandal, every prominent Democrat (politicians, pundits, activists) should hammer it repeatedly in interviews and online. Creating an echo chamber for fact-based outrage will make it harder for Fox News to dominate the narrative unchallenged. It may require investing in progressive media outlets and coordinating with left-leaning shows or influencers, but a more synchronized messaging operation will amplify outrage that resonates with Democratic values.
• Frame Issues in Moral (Not Just Technical) Terms: To cultivate moral outrage, Democrats must talk about issues in terms of right and wrong, not just data and policy specs. For instance, instead of only citing statistics about income inequality, a Democrat can thunder that “it’s a moral outrage that millions of children go hungry in the richest country on Earth.” Every policy – from health care to climate change – has a moral dimension that can be emphasized. Republicans excel at taking even minor topics (e.g. a fictional “War on Christmas”) and imbuing them with grandiose moral stakes to fire up their base. Democrats should do the same with real injustices: voter suppression, mass shootings, attacks on minority rights, corporate greed, etc. Highlight the human stories and victims behind these issues to put a face on the injustice. This emotional framing will engage voters’ hearts, not just their heads. The key is to communicate that Democrats are outraged because their core values of fairness, freedom, and compassion are being violated – and that every American should be outraged too. By repeatedly underscoring the moral urgency of problems (and the GOP’s role in them), Democrats can make their message stick in an emotionally resonant way.
• Be Consistent and Authentic in Anger: One insight from Stewart and Hasan is that outrage cannot be occasional or opportunistic – it has to feel authentic and continuous to inspire people[1]. Voters can tell when a politician’s anger is just for show. Thus, Democrats need to maintain a steady tone of moral urgency about their key issues. As Mehdi Hasan noted, “that authentic rage and anger and moral outrage has to be there on the part of the Democratic Party” — it can’t be an “on-off switch” that’s flipped only when convenient[1]. This means if a Democrat delivers a passionate speech one day, they shouldn’t undercut it with silence or contradictory votes the next. For example, if a senator stages an impassioned filibuster against an injustice, they must continue pressing that cause in coming weeks (and avoid, say, quietly supporting a compromise that betrays the earlier passion). Relentlessness is key: express outrage at every turn when core principles are at stake. Over time, voters will come to see Democrats as the party that truly cares – not just in words, but in sustained deeds – about the moral direction of the country.
• Leverage Social Media and Viral Content: To counter Fox’s megaphone, Democrats should fully exploit the reach of social platforms for spreading outrage-driven narratives. Republican communicators have long “understood the benefits of outrage and the Facebook algorithm, to amplify [their] message and flood the zone”, as former Obama aide Dan Pfeiffer observed[6]. Democrats can do the same in a fact-centered way. This means encouraging Democratic politicians, aides, and supporters to create shareable videos, memes, and posts that channel moral outrage. For example, a short clip of a Democrat furiously grilling a Trump official or GOP lawmaker in a hearing can go viral on Twitter, TikTok, or YouTube – carrying the outrage to millions who never watch C-SPAN. Offices should hire creative teams to distill hearings and speeches into punchy highlights with subtitles and emotional music for maximum impact. Additionally, party organizers can coordinate hashtag campaigns around moral causes (e.g. #JusticeFor[Victim] or #NoMoreChildrenInCages) to concentrate attention. The idea is to flood social media with compelling moral content, so that even those not tuning into cable news will encounter passionate Democratic messages on their feeds. A strong digital operation, as Pfeiffer argues, effectively becomes a modern “node of amplification” that can carry Democratic outrage far and wide[7].
• Empower Like-Minded Media Personalities: Democrats should actively collaborate with friendly media voices – from cable news hosts to comedians and online commentators – who can broadcast moral outrage on their platforms. While MSNBC and CNN are not partisan counterparts to Fox in structure, they do feature progressive-leaning voices that could be utilized more strategically. Encourage liberal hosts (on TV or podcasts) to coordinate topics on big outrage themes of the week. For instance, if Republican legislators just blocked a gun safety bill after a school shooting, multiple MSNBC shows could lead with that story, each with a tone of righteous anger and personal stories from victims – effectively saturating that day’s coverage with a unified moral message. Additionally, support progressive talk shows and podcasts that energize the base. This might include boosting content from influencers on YouTube or Twitch who already galvanize young liberals. Democrats can appear on these platforms as guests, bringing their indignation directly to receptive audiences. The party might even invest in new programming that fills gaps in the media ecosystem – e.g. a liberal “rapid response” webcast that each night deconstructs and refutes the day’s right-wing outrage story, reframing it around progressive values. By partnering with media personalities who share their values, Democrats ensure the choir is not only preached to, but amplified. Remember, Fox’s advantage is partly an infrastructure one – decades of building up outlets and pundits who reinforce the conservative narrative[2]. It’s past time for Democrats to consciously nurture their own ecosystem of outrage magnifiers.
• Confront Misinformation and Call Out Hypocrisy in Real Time: Being outraged also means naming and shaming the offenders without mincing words. Democratic media surrogates and officials should boldly call lies lies, and label harmful policies for what they are – whether “cruel,” “corrupt,” “un-American,” or even “authoritarian.” This kind of blunt moral language grabs attention and shifts the terms of debate. For example, when Fox News pushes a false or bigoted narrative (say, about immigrants or LGBTQ people), Democrats shouldn’t respond with a mealy-mouthed fact-check alone – they should express outrage that Americans are being deceived and divided by such propaganda. A possible tactic is to establish a dedicated “war room” to monitor right-wing media and rapidly counter falsehoods with both facts and moral condemnation. If Fox pundits spread a conspiracy theory, within hours Democrats could have spokespeople on other networks and social media angrily denouncing the misinformation and defending the targeted group with moral clarity. Importantly, Democrats can also go on the offensive: don’t just play defense against Fox – proactively highlight right-wing media’s ugliest moments (e.g. hosts downplaying January 6 or mocking the poor) to generate outrage at Fox itself. This turns the tables and puts Fox on the back foot. In short, meet each wave of disinformation with an equal or greater wave of justified outrage. Voters will see one side making baseless noise, and the other standing up passionately for truth and decency.
• Engage Conservative Platforms (Selectively) to Break the Echo Chamber: While Democrats rightfully criticize Fox News as a “propaganda arm of the Republican Party”[8], ignoring it entirely can be a missed opportunity to demonstrate confidence and conviction. Savvy Democratic figures might occasionally appear on Fox News or other conservative media – not to appease them, but to confront falsehoods on their own turf and show undecided viewers a contrast. This requires careful strategy (it’s easy to get sandbagged by a hostile host), but some have done it effectively. For example, Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders have gone on Fox and, by calmly but forcefully pushing back on loaded questions, managed to elicit audience applause for progressive ideas. A Democrat on Fox can say, “I’m outraged that this network spends so much time on trivial nonsense while real Americans suffer – let’s talk about the families who can’t pay for insulin…” Such appearances, if well-executed, generate buzz in mainstream media too. Even if Fox’s core viewers remain unmoved, these moments signal to the broader public (and Democratic base) that the party isn’t afraid to fight back anywhere. It undercuts the right-wing narrative that Democrats are “weak” or hiding. The caveat: one must pick battles wisely; going on a fringe conspiracy show is usually not worth it. But engaging high-profile conservative forums with a compelling moral argument can earn respect and expand the audience for Democratic outrage.

Legislative and Political Tactics to Channel Outrage

• Turn Congressional Hearings into Moral Theater: Congress isn’t just for lawmaking – it’s a stage. Republicans have long used hearings and investigations as performances to stoke anger (think of the prolonged Benghazi committee or the recent theatrical “weaponization of government” hearings). Democrats should similarly use their powers in Congress or state legislatures to hold hearings that dramatize moral issues and Republican failures. For example, a Democratic-led committee could hold public hearings on child poverty, calling as witnesses struggling parents, respected economists, and even religious leaders – all testifying how inaction is morally unacceptable. Televised moments like a victim’s tearful testimony or a Democrat excoriating a negligent official can cut through the news cycle and move viewers. Even in the minority, Democrats on committees can invite witnesses who highlight the human cost of GOP policies (e.g. a transgender student talking about bullying in a hearing on education). Planning is key: choose topics where Democrats clearly stand on the side of justice (civil rights, disaster response, veterans’ care) and expose GOP lawmakers’ indifference or complicity on camera. A well-structured hearing will yield viral clips of Democrats delivering zingers or emotional appeals, perfect for the media machine mentioned above. The January 6th Select Committee in 2022 was a masterclass in this: by methodically presenting evidence and evoking patriotic outrage at an attack on our democracy, it captured primetime audiences and shaped public opinion[9][10]. Future Democratic-led inquiries – whether into corporate price gouging, extremist violence, or government abuses – should be designed not just to inform, but to inspire outrage and demand accountability.
• Force Votes to Expose Values: Legislative maneuvers can also serve to draw moral contrasts. Democrats can introduce “message” bills or resolutions that, while unlikely to pass a GOP-controlled chamber, compel everyone to take a stand on moral issues. For instance, put forward a resolution denouncing white nationalism in explicit terms, or a bill to cap insulin prices at $10. When many Republicans inevitably oppose or block these, Democrats can express outraged disbelief and make it a headline: “Every single GOP senator just voted against condemning white supremacy – shameful.” This strategy essentially creates news events that highlight extremism or callousness on the other side. It provides fresh fodder for the media and talking heads to discuss (“Why did Republicans vote no on such a basic statement?”). Similarly, use amendments on must-pass bills to force hard votes: e.g. an amendment to a budget that would protect veterans’ health funding – if the GOP votes it down, that’s ammunition for outrage. Importantly, Democrats should coordinate the messaging around these votes: hold press conferences right after, flanked by advocacy groups, expressing moral outrage at the outcome and telling personal stories of those affected. This keeps the focus on values rather than procedural blame. Over time, a pattern emerges painting the GOP as a party of consistent cruelty or hypocrisy, reinforcing the Democrats’ narrative that “we fight for what’s right, they obstruct or harm.”
• Adopt a Bold, Relentless Legislative Style: Too often, Democrats try to show they are “reasonable” or low-key in hopes of winning centrist credibility, but this can come across as meekness in today’s polarized climate. An alternative (especially on high-stakes issues) is to embrace a more confrontational, take-no-prisoners style in legislating – one that visibly channels the urgency activists feel. This could mean strategic obstructionism when appropriate: for example, in a state legislature, if Republicans are ramming through an egregious voter suppression law, Democrats might walk out or deny quorum (as Texas Democrats did in 2021) to protest its moral illegitimacy. Or it might mean using parliamentary maneuvers to slow down and draw attention to bad bills – turning what would’ve been a quiet vote into a dramatic public fight. When Senator Chris Murphy filibustered on the Senate floor for nearly 15 hours in 2016 demanding action on gun violence, it was a stirring moment of moral clarity that earned widespread news coverage and energized gun-control supporters. Democrats should not shy from repeating such tactics. Even if they ultimately lose a vote, the fight itself sends a message of passionate commitment. Additionally, embrace symbolic gestures that underscore moral stands: staging a sit-in on the House floor for gun control (as Democrats did after the Pulse nightclub shooting), wearing #MeToo or pro-democracy buttons during sessions, inviting guests like survivors to the State of the Union and then pointing them out in speeches – these gestures create powerful visuals and narratives. The legislative arena can produce the moral imagery that later feeds into campaign ads and media stories, showing Democrats literally standing up (or sitting in) for what’s right.
• Work in Tandem with Grassroots Movements: Democratic officials should treat progressive grassroots groups and protests not as separate from their work, but as an extension of it. When citizens are marching in the streets out of moral outrage – whether for racial justice, climate action, or women’s rights – elected Democrats ought to echo and elevate that outrage inside the halls of power. This can be done by citing protest slogans and demands in speeches, entering letters or petitions from activists into the congressional record, or even joining protesters briefly to signal solidarity. For example, if thousands rally against family separations at the border, a Democrat in Congress might read the stories of a few affected families during a hearing, then thunder, “Americans across the country are protesting because this is inhumane – and they are right!” By linking the grassroots moral energy to official proceedings, Democrats give legitimacy to the protesters while also borrowing some of their passion. Moreover, legislators can partner with activists in crafting bold proposals (e.g. the Green New Deal was championed by Sunrise Movement youth activists alongside members of Congress). Such partnership ensures the outrage doesn’t fizzle after a news cycle, but translates into concrete policy pushes. It also shows voters that Democrats aren’t isolated in DC – they’re part of a broader moral movement for change. In summary, feeding the fire in the streets and the fire in Congress together creates a larger blaze of public pressure that neither Fox News nor cautious colleagues can easily ignore.
• Keep the Focus on People, Not Politicians: To sustain moral outrage, always circle back to those who are hurt or helped by government actions. Legislators should habitually center their rhetoric on real people’s experiences, rather than on inside-baseball or on attacking colleagues personally. For example, instead of simply saying “Republicans are blocking our bill,” a morally outraged Democrat would say, “Republicans are blocking our bill to feed hungry kids – every day they stall, children in our districts will go to bed hungry, and that is unacceptable.” This framing does two things: it maintains moral high ground (the outrage is about a principle, not a partisan grudge) and it invites voters to share the outrage because they empathize with the affected people. Democratic lawmakers and candidates can invite constituents onstage to tell their story – then respond with visible anger at how they were treated. (Think of moments when politicians’ voices crack talking about a family bankrupted by medical bills, vowing “This is wrong, and we’re going to fix it.”) Such moments stick in the public memory far more than dry stats or partisan insults. They also pressure the opposition: it’s hard for a target of the outrage to respond without seeming cold or cruel toward the people at the center. By personalizing every issue, Democrats make their moral outrage relatable and harder to dismiss. It changes the conversation from left vs. right to right vs. wrong, which is exactly where they want it.
• Foster a Culture of Discipline and Unity: Finally, to credibly project relentless outrage, Democrats must present a united moral front whenever possible. Nothing saps momentum like prominent Democrats undercutting each other’s message or appearing divided about outrage-worthy issues. The party should develop an internal culture that rewards outspoken advocacy and holds accountable those who stray from core values. For instance, if a Democrat voices more outrage at fellow Democrats than at Republicans’ misdeeds on an important issue, party elders and base voters should call them out and urge them to refocus on the true opponents. Conversely, when Democrats take brave stands or articulate moral truths, their colleagues should amplify those moments. (Imagine every Democratic senator sharing on social media a particularly fiery floor speech by one of their own, so it reaches a wide audience.) A united front also means staying on message: repetition is not a vice in messaging – it’s how narratives are built. If leadership decides the outrage theme of the week is democracy under attack, then from Sunday talk shows to local town halls, almost every Democrat should be hitting that theme with their own passionate spin. Discipline in messaging helped the GOP ingrain ideas like “socialism” or “woke mobs” in the public consciousness; discipline can likewise ingrain positive ideas like “protecting our freedoms” or “demanding justice” in voters’ minds associated with Democrats. Unity does not mean unanimity on every policy, but it does mean prioritizing the fight at hand over internal squabbles. By minimizing public divisions and maximizing a cohesive moral narrative, Democrats will find their collective roar is much louder than individual whispers.

Conclusion:
Cultivating “relentless moral outrage” is about more than venting anger – it’s about communicating to Americans that Democrats have fire in the belly to defend democracy, fairness, and people’s well-being. As Stewart and Hasan noted, the Democratic Party can no longer afford to be bloodless or purely technocratic in the face of a passionate, emotive conservative movement. It must channel the justified anger that so many Americans feel into a focused political force. That means engaging the media ecosystem with intentionality, so that outrage at injustice becomes just as omnipresent from the left as manufactured outrage is from the right. And it means behaving in legislatures not just as negotiators, but as prophets for a cause, willing to cry out in the wilderness when needed. Importantly, this moral outrage should always be tethered to facts and aimed at making positive change – it’s not outrage for outrage’s sake, but for moral awakening and action.

By implementing the strategies above – synchronizing messages, framing issues morally, staying authentic and consistent, utilizing media savvy, staging impactful legislative moments, and uniting behind core values – Democrats can begin to even the playing field. They can create their own 24/7 messaging machine of justice: one that calls out wrongdoing without fear, uplifts the oppressed, and inspires voters through righteous passion. In the long run, this kind of values-driven outrage, if done right, can help wrest control of the national narrative back from the right-wing noise machine and remind Americans what moral leadership looks like[11]. As one analyst put it, Democrats must “find a way to make headway in modern media” or risk fading away[3] – and embracing relentless moral outrage may be the key to that headway. It’s time to raise the volume, sharpen the message, and never let up in speaking out for what’s right. The stakes – for truth, democracy, and people’s lives – demand nothing less.

Sources:

• Politico Magazine – “11 Democratic Thinkers on What the Party Needs Right Now” (analysis of Democratic messaging shortcomings and GOP’s outrage machine)[3][2].
• The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart (Jan 2025 episode) – Transcript of Jon Stewart’s interview with Mehdi Hasan, discussing media bias and Democratic strategy (calls for authentic, consistent moral outrage)[1].
• Vox – Interview with Dan Pfeiffer, “Pod Save America” co-host and former Obama aide, on the importance of progressive media infrastructure and using social media outrage effectively[6][7].
• Washington Post – “A rare peek inside Fox News’s outrage machine” (analysis of how Fox News, e.g. Tucker Carlson, crafts narratives to fuel grievance and anger)[12][13].
• Apple Podcasts (The Weekly Show) – Episode description for “Debating Reality with Mehdi Hasan” (highlights the need for Democrats to match Republicans’ ruthless tactics and messaging)[14].

---

[1] [8] The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart – Debating Reality with Mehdi Hasan Transcript and Discussion

https://podscripts.co/podcasts/the-weekly-show-with-jon-stewart/debating-reality-with-mehdi-hasan

[2] [3] [4] [5] [11] [12] [13] 11 Democratic Thinkers on What the Party Needs Right Now – POLITICO

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/11/07/10-democratic-thinkers-on-what-the-party-needs-right-now-00187993

[6] [7] Pod Save America’s Dan Pfeiffer has some advice for Democrats: Learn how to use Facebook, ASAP! | Vox

https://www.vox.com/2018/6/19/17476898/pod-save-america-crooked-media-dan-pfeiffer-yes-we-still-can-book-facebook-democrats-peter-kafka

[9] [10] A rare peek inside Fox News’s outrage machine – The Washington Post

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/04/26/tucker-carlson-trump-jan-6-riot

[14] The Weekly Show with Jon Stewart – Podcast – Apple Podcasts

https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-weekly-show-with-jon-stewart/id1583132133